Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Parker Identification/Value
Unread 10-07-2020, 10:35 PM   #1
Member
Rheinmetall44
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts

Default Parker Identification/Value

I recently came upon (what I believe to be) a parker shotgun. I am not a shotgun guy by any means and after doing some research I am finding myself overwhelmed. So I figured I'd turn to the experts for some wisdom.

From my limited research I believe this to be a 12ga, 1901, DH, size 2 frame, Titanic steel gun.

However, this shotgun seems way too nice, like it was definitely refinished, or maybe is a reproduction. One of the previous owners was a wealthy avid sportsman, and messed with it, like adding an engraved silver grip cap, as well as maybe adding a new stock? This shotgun doesn't look like anything else I've seen.

I was wondering what your guy's thought on it are, and what you think it'd be worth. Most likely not as much as a more period correct parker I'd imagine.

A full album can be found here: https://imgur.com/a/duLQOmk

Thanks!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20201006_174510_resized.jpg (494.3 KB, 60 views)
File Type: jpg 20201006_174542_resized.jpg (497.4 KB, 44 views)
File Type: jpg 20201006_174557_resized.jpg (502.3 KB, 31 views)
File Type: jpg 20201006_174844_resized.jpg (487.4 KB, 28 views)
File Type: jpg 20201006_174807_resized.jpg (497.0 KB, 26 views)
Connor Craig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Connor Craig For Your Post:
Unread 10-08-2020, 07:46 AM   #2
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,578
Thanks: 476
Thanked 17,518 Times in 4,619 Posts

Default

The gun is a DH grade (grade 3 hammerless).
And you are correct. None of the finishes are original, or correct. The barrels are re-blued, the frame has been buffed. The engine turning (jeweling) on the frame and barrels are not correct in any way. And the wood on the gun is not factory original (aftermarket replacements not of proper form or from the proper species of wood).
As far as value, it would be pretty low compared to unaltered examples. Maybe $500-700 to most who know what they are looking at. But if it goes bang and breaks targets, there is some value in that.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 10-08-2020, 09:04 AM   #3
Member
Harry Collins
PGCA Member
 
Harry Collins's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,911
Thanks: 9,940
Thanked 1,757 Times in 732 Posts

Default

Conner,

We have a book that list many Parkers by serial number. Unfortunately yours was one of the serial numbers that was not included. The three serial numbers in the book that followed your Parker were all DH guns with Titanic Steel Barrels. 105975 had 30" barrels. 105977 & 978 sported 32" barrels. I was wondering what the length of you barrels? Brian is a wealth of knowledge and I trust his assessment on value, condition, etc. A friend of mines grandfather ordered an AH with Whitworth Steel barrels in 1897. He was a live bird shot and had sent the gun back to the factory five times for minor adjustments to stock and additional sets of barrels with minor changes in pattern. I suspect your Parker was used as a trap or live bird gun with the stock and frond changed to shoot a higher pattern. I can't tell from the pictures on my small computer screen, but it appears the checkering is skip line. Makes me think the work was done in the 1970's.

Kindest,
Harry
Harry Collins is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Harry Collins For Your Post:
Unread 10-08-2020, 10:02 AM   #4
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,580
Thanks: 6,149
Thanked 8,854 Times in 4,747 Posts

Default

Aftermarket non selective Miller trigger. Gun was reassembled with no thought given to proper screw placement or alignment. A good gunsmith could fix the screw problem and probably end up with a good working shotgun with no collector value. The lack of automatic ejectors and the presence of the Miller trigger probably are signs that the gun will work.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post:
Unread 10-08-2020, 10:41 AM   #5
Member
Phil Yearout
PGCA Member
 
Phil Yearout's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,222
Thanks: 5,086
Thanked 4,018 Times in 1,065 Posts

Default

Looks like it's restocked to pretty modern dimensions - not much DAH etc. Could be a great shooter and ain't nothin' wrong with that!
__________________
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so. - Mark Twain.
Phil Yearout is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Phil Yearout For Your Post:
Unread 10-08-2020, 01:07 PM   #6
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,607
Thanks: 1,631
Thanked 7,833 Times in 2,362 Posts

Default

Nice that whoever did the rework used a Model 21 style yoke in the beavertail forearm. What is the barrel length? Hopefully the barrels haven't been cut.

The RESEARCH LETTER pick on the home page shows the PGCA has information on this gun to do a letter on how it left the factory.

Also, it is of the time period when the Titanic Steel barrel guns have a K in the barrel steel location on the barrel flats --

105974 02 K in barrel steel location.jpg

instead of the more familiar T in a circle --

151999 03 T in circle barrel steel.jpg
Dave Noreen is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post:
Unread 10-08-2020, 01:38 PM   #7
Member
Rheinmetall44
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts

Default

Ok, thanks for all the info!

Shame about the value, but it's still an beautiful gun regardless. And yeah, 1970's-ish would be about the timeframe where this gun saw the most use, so it would make sense that the modifications were done then.

It has 30" barrels, although the muzzle end seems to look a little sloppy, to my untrained eye.

And if I were to take this out to shoot clays, would it be safe to run modern 2 3/4 target loads through it?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20201008_132017_resized.jpg (287.6 KB, 6 views)
File Type: jpg 20201008_132003_resized.jpg (220.3 KB, 5 views)
Connor Craig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Connor Craig For Your Post:
Unread 10-08-2020, 02:10 PM   #8
Member
Randy Roberts
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Randy G Roberts's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 2,906
Thanks: 4,458
Thanked 5,659 Times in 1,854 Posts

Default

[QUOTE=Dave Noreen;313609]Nice that whoever did the rework used a Model 21 style yoke in the beavertail forearm. /QUOTE]

Dick Washburn was known to do the same at least in some of his upgrades.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DW.jpg (303.8 KB, 10 views)
Randy G Roberts is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Randy G Roberts For Your Post:
Unread 10-08-2020, 03:41 PM   #9
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,618
Thanks: 35,563
Thanked 33,188 Times in 12,368 Posts

Default

Veeery interesting reinforcing layout inside that forend Randy. And a very interesting forend iron engraving and sculpting for strength.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 10-08-2020, 03:42 PM   #10
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,618
Thanks: 35,563
Thanked 33,188 Times in 12,368 Posts

Default

The wall thickness on the muzzles would seem to indicate some serious choke!!

And the termination of the matting is factory finished... keels in place and all. Ribs may have been re-layed at some point in time.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.