Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 04-14-2013, 10:25 AM   #11
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,608
Thanks: 1,632
Thanked 7,835 Times in 2,362 Posts

Default

I wasn't trying to imply anything, and certainly not suggest --
Quote:
...it would be detrimental to shoot light loads in a gun capable of shooting heavy loads?
I was just providing some history of 16-gauge loads in North America and what loads were available at the time the gun in question was built.

I'm sure in my own mind that most of these old guns that were in service in the 1920s, 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s and 70s were more often than not being shot with the heaviest loads available. That just being the mind set of the great bulk of North American Nimrods.
Dave Noreen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post:
Unread 04-14-2013, 01:07 PM   #12
Member
nolasoleil
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Default

FRIENDS...

I deeply appreciate your thoughtful and thorough advice.
Sunny Gauntt is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-15-2013, 10:20 AM   #13
Member
Dennis
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 666
Thanks: 48
Thanked 418 Times in 202 Posts

Default

Doesn't the frame size have much to do about what shells are fired in a gun? If I had a 1/2 frame 12 gauge I would feed it light loads which would be great for upland game. I also would most likely not use it for a turkey gun though it may work just fine depending on range. If it was a number 2 frame I would have no hesitation using it for waterfowl or late season pheasant hunting with 2 3/4 inch heavy loads if all else was in good condition. I don't mean baby magnum loads. As stated before though never steel shot for me in a double.

Dennis
Dennis V. Nix is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-15-2013, 10:30 AM   #14
Member
Kensal Rise
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,769
Thanks: 583
Thanked 2,577 Times in 926 Posts

Default

Dennis:
In a way, you are correct. Frame size relates to gun weight and proportion. Smaller frames generally result in lighter guns (all else being equal). Thus lighter loads are appropriate for lighter guns. But it only takes a few good hits with the right size shot to bag a turkey. For that, choke and shooting distance play the major role -- not so much charge weight.
Every original Parker ever made is now a century old or close to it. And out of respect for that and their aging wood, I would not personally put a 2 3/4 inch "heavy load" through any of them. Especially when it's not necessary.
John Campbell is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to John Campbell For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.