Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Question for Parker Historians
Unread 08-11-2018, 06:20 PM   #1
Member
BRDHNTR
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,784
Thanks: 7,306
Thanked 2,748 Times in 1,258 Posts

Default Question for Parker Historians

I may have overlooked it but i could not find the answer in The Parker Story to the following question. When Parker re-barreled one of their guns, did they serial number the barrels to the same serial numbers elsewhere on the gun?

Also, does anyone know what 44 stamped on the barrel flats means?
allen newell is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-11-2018, 07:02 PM   #2
Member
Jeff K.
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Admin

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,388
Thanks: 803
Thanked 2,793 Times in 651 Posts

Default

from my experience, yes they put the serial number of the gun on the new barrels.
I would not say that was the practice 100% of the time.
Jeff Kuss is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-11-2018, 07:07 PM   #3
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,633
Thanks: 6,190
Thanked 8,910 Times in 4,774 Posts

Default

4 4 is probably the unstruck barrel weight of a 12 gauge gun. 4 pounds, 4 ounces.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-11-2018, 07:49 PM   #4
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,598
Thanks: 484
Thanked 17,652 Times in 4,631 Posts

Default

A set of replacement barrels would be marked and numbered in the exact same manner as any barrel set put on a new gun.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 08-11-2018, 08:22 PM   #5
Member
King Cobb
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bill Holcombe's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,325
Thanks: 724
Thanked 1,521 Times in 405 Posts

Default

Only discrepancy might be if the barrel steel types don't line up with what original steel type. Several guns that vame from factory with damascus got replaced with Vulcan.
__________________
"The Parker gun was the first and the greatest ever." Theophilus Nash Buckingham
Bill Holcombe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bill Holcombe For Your Post:
Unread 08-12-2018, 07:16 AM   #6
Member
Southpaw
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 653
Thanks: 634
Thanked 275 Times in 197 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Holcombe View Post
Only discrepancy might be if the barrel steel types don't line up with what original steel type. Several guns that vame from factory with damascus got replaced with Vulcan.
That is an interesting comment. In the spirit of just conversation, why do you suppose those barrels were changed out to Vulcan. Probably a myriad of reasons. Guns are tools that were knocked and banged around and used I am guessing and using Vulcan was just the most economical repair at the time in the evolving faster, better, less expensive industrial process management. Or, was that a conscientious decision to make a change to use modern powder.

I am probably guessing D. All the above. Unless you may know something.

Last edited by Todd Poer; 08-12-2018 at 07:30 AM..
Todd Poer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-12-2018, 09:02 AM   #7
Member
King Cobb
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bill Holcombe's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,325
Thanks: 724
Thanked 1,521 Times in 405 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd Poer View Post
That is an interesting comment. In the spirit of just conversation, why do you suppose those barrels were changed out to Vulcan. Probably a myriad of reasons. Guns are tools that were knocked and banged around and used I am guessing and using Vulcan was just the most economical repair at the time in the evolving faster, better, less expensive industrial process management. Or, was that a conscientious decision to make a change to use modern powder.

I am probably guessing D. All the above. Unless you may know something.
As I understand it, when you got a set of replacement barrels, you had the option of paying to get a matching type or a cheaper barrel type. You see it also with barrels that were added from the factory later. Sometimes they match barrel ttpe sometimes they don't.
__________________
"The Parker gun was the first and the greatest ever." Theophilus Nash Buckingham
Bill Holcombe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Holcombe For Your Post:
Unread 08-12-2018, 11:01 AM   #8
Member
Southpaw
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 653
Thanks: 634
Thanked 275 Times in 197 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Holcombe View Post
As I understand it, when you got a set of replacement barrels, you had the option of paying to get a matching type or a cheaper barrel type. You see it also with barrels that were added from the factory later. Sometimes they match barrel ttpe sometimes they don't.
Thanks. I think Dean and Brian have alluded something similar to your reply as well. It is never just one thing probably that would make someone make a change from a duplication to replacement. Sometimes price at the end of the day does matter.

My only other thought and not certain if any merit to it is that maybe some asked for new barrels based on new generation of barrels for modern powder use. Maybe its just me when I hear the word "cheaper" it has a sense of derogatory tone like it is something of less quality as opposed to just being less expensive. I get it may have less grade because it does not have scrollwork or inlay and hence less pricey.

I don't know maybe I was thinking someone asking for Vulcan barrels might have been folks that were early adopters of the change. But as dean alluded to some of the change was forced. I think I do recall a thought at the time that damascus was tried and proven and some were slow to adapt to new fangled fluid steel.

I guess it is somewhat the same as having barrels that are fixed choked as opposed to getting a gun with screw in chokes.
Todd Poer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-11-2018, 08:27 PM   #9
Member
Craig Budgeon
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 480
Thanks: 123
Thanked 342 Times in 208 Posts

Default

I have 2 rebarreled by Parker and by Remington. The first was rebarreled by Parker in 1911 and letters to that fact. The 2nd. was rebarreled Remington in 1948 and has the repair codes to that effect. The Remington rebarrel was originally produced as a 12 ga with Damascus barrels and now has steel barrels that are 16 ga now on a #1 framed gun.The Remington barrel gun has the chokes marked o the flats; the gauge, grade, and shell length on the frame lug. Serial numbers match the frame numbers.
Craig Budgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-11-2018, 08:30 PM   #10
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,598
Thanks: 484
Thanked 17,652 Times in 4,631 Posts

Default

Craig, but the important thing about the Remington rebarrel is that those extra markings (choke, grade, chambers and gauge) is how Remington normally marked Parker barrels before production ended.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.