Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 08-24-2012, 11:23 PM   #11
Member
winplumber
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,631
Thanks: 1,757
Thanked 634 Times in 403 Posts

Default

What types of Steel are we talking about here ? All ? Damascus & Fluid ?
Steve Huffman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-25-2012, 12:08 AM   #12
Member
OLD GEEZER
PGCA Member
 
Thomas L. Benson Sr.'s Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,286
Thanks: 3,675
Thanked 1,547 Times in 503 Posts

Smile

I would consider all types of barrel thickness info important.Thanks Thomas
Thomas L. Benson Sr. is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-25-2012, 07:30 AM   #13
Member
winplumber
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,631
Thanks: 1,757
Thanked 634 Times in 403 Posts

Default

What I mean do we use the same minimum for Stub ,Twist, Damascus, Bernard ,Laminated and Fluid steel which is .025" in the forward 2/3 of the barrels length.
Steve Huffman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-25-2012, 08:26 AM   #14
Member
ed good
On Vacation

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 787
Thanks: 205
Thanked 203 Times in 124 Posts

Default

personally, i would not consider shooting any non fluid steel barrelled gun with wall thickness less than .040 thousands...and then, only if blessed by someone with far more knowledge of such things than yours truly.
ed good is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-25-2012, 03:28 PM   #15
Member
winplumber
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,631
Thanks: 1,757
Thanked 634 Times in 403 Posts

Default

Ed, Then what is your minimum for fluid steel ?
Steve Huffman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-25-2012, 04:50 PM   #16
Member
ed good
On Vacation

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 787
Thanks: 205
Thanked 203 Times in 124 Posts

Default

my gunsmith, who has over 60 years of experience, recommends .030 of an inch as the minimum for safe shooting.
ed good is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ed good For Your Post:
Unread 08-26-2012, 12:00 AM   #17
Member
Joe Wood
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 163
Thanks: 146
Thanked 152 Times in 53 Posts

Default

If you set .030 as a minimum there are an awful lot of original Parker's you're not going to shoot. I have three which I'm nearly certain haven't been honed which have walls less than that. I too like the thicker walls but not from fear of a burst but rather because I'd prefer to have extra metal for repairs in case of a dent. Of corse I'm speaking of the forward half or third of the barrel. I'm very critical of having acceptable wall thickness in the first 12". "Acceptable" is a subjective call and the intended ammunition for the gun has a huge bearing on the decision. For instance, I shoot two #1 frames that have from .090 to .095 in front of the forcing cones and that's fine because these are very light upland guns. My duck guns have a lot more armor than that around my hands.

Oh, they're all Damascus.
Joe Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Joe Wood For Your Post:
Unread 08-26-2012, 10:36 AM   #18
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,580
Thanks: 6,150
Thanked 8,854 Times in 4,747 Posts

Default

My Vulcan Steel ten has minimum wall thickness of exactly .100". Talk about a gun that would drive Sherman Bell crazy!
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-26-2012, 03:27 PM   #19
Member
Holeshot
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 700
Thanks: 1,673
Thanked 264 Times in 156 Posts

Default

Atomic warhead?
David Holes is offline   Reply With Quote
barrel wall thickness
Unread 08-27-2012, 11:41 PM   #20
Member
jay shachter
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 31
Thanks: 0
Thanked 78 Times in 7 Posts

Default barrel wall thickness

Hello Guys,

I don't chime in on these conversations often, but the topic keeps coming up. Many know that I own Vintage Firearms, Inc. and buy and sell many Parker guns. Every gun I buy has been measured for minimum barrel wall thickness. In addition, I measure many more sets for others or when contemplating guns to buy for inventory. I measure 300-500 sets of barrels a year. Not all Parkers mind you, but many are. For all I have had through my shop, I have records in spread sheet format that allows me easily to go down a column to see how the numbers fall.

Regarding accepted barrel wall thickness for shooting modern loads, it seems everybody has an opinion. Many of the gunsmiths that render opinions on wall thickness of 25 thou or above work more on modern guns than vintage doubles. If you ask a person who has spent his life working on fine VINTAGE double shotguns, they better understand how these guns were made and have much different opinions on the subject. Most all agree that even 18 thou in the forward half of the barrels is not dangerous from a bursting or bulging stand point, but rather the risk of dents and damage that cannot be repaired as there is not enough metal to work with. More on 18 thou later.

If you ask me, the Brits have been the fussiest about barrels for almost 2centuries, and set the mark for proof testing. Forget opinions based upon everybody bloviating and regurgitating what they have heard or what their friend's opinion is. The British proof houses regularly try and blow up perfectly good guns! They see what barrels can handle by passing not one, but two definitive proof loads through each barrel. I believe the loads are 18,500psi. We all shoot loads that are below 12,500psi (magnum loads), and most of us shoot more reasonable loads that run under 10,000psi. And the guys that have patterned their guns with loads like RST Shells recognize it is not speed that kills, but the nice even patterns premium ammunition provide. RST Shells don't exceed 8000psi. Go to www.rstshells.com for very affordable, safe loads for your beloved doubles.

If barrels with 20 thou wall thickness were regularly failing the proof they would not mention that as the recommended minimum. The facts are that barrels under 20 thou regularly pass proof and are deemed safe. Barrels with 20 thou and all other characteristicds in good shape pass proof in overwhelmingly high numbers. It is extremely rare for failure in the rigid proof testing for barrels in excellent condition because of wall thickness of 18 thou or above. Barrels fail for other reasons, but not often from bursting or changing bore diameters as in bulges. AND REMEMBER, THIS IS WITH 18,500 PSI LOADS!

Doesn't repeated, large sample, empirical testing that occurs in very controlled circumstances trump untried opinions? Especially with DEFINITIVE PROOF LOADS?

The British Gun Trade Association clearly states that 20 thou is the generally accepted minimum for judging healthy guns. This is stated in the Jan/Feb 2012 issue of Shooting Sportsman, and in another Shooting Sportsman article from Sept/Oct 2009 issue. Unless you are shooting guns with obstructions in the barrels, there is no measurable risk shooting reasonable loads in guns with 20 thou wall thickness at least 15" from the muzzle, provided all other issues are sound, like tight ribs, no serious dents, etc. This is not opinion, but data collected for decades under controlled testing.

Now, from my experience I think many Parker collectors and shooters may be surprised that I have measured at least 20 guns that were 20ga. or 16ga. guns on "O" frames that were definitively factory original in the way of blue and bore diameter. They were never backbored or polished inside, and never filed or machined on the outside since leaving the factory, and they had areas 6-12" back from the muzzle that were 18 thou, FROM THE FACTORY. This is almost always in a 3-4" area very close to the top rib or bottom rib, and only on one side of the tube. As one person on this thread mentioned, virtually all vintage American doubles have a very noticeable lack of concentricity, ie thicker on one side than the other. There is also the matter of soldering on the ribs, with the required filing of overflow solder tight in to the rib, creating these thin spots.

All of these guns were very lightweight Parkers. Where most 20ga. Parkers weigh in the neighborhood of 6 1/4lbs., often a few ounces more, how do you think the factory came up with the guns that weigh less than 6lbs. or even 5 3/4lbs.? It is damn hard to hawg a butt and remove 3 oz. of wood. It is usually more like 2 ounces with a lot of hawging. And once hawged out, how do you think they keep the gun from being barrel heavy? They filed metal from the barrels, that is how.

The guns I refer to have been shot for generations, and 10 years ago hunters would regularly use high base shells for everything. After 70-100 years of use they are still unchanged and have perfect barrels.

How many of the opinion makers actually own high quality barrel wall thickness gauges? Not many I can assure you. I travel the country and am surprised how few buyers of fine shotguns own one, let alone know how they are used. If you are going to buy more than a few shotguns in your life, I recommend looking at the Hosford and Co. barrel wall thickness gauge. One mistake in buying a bad set of barrels on an expensive gun will pay for the gauge 5 times over. The Hosford gauge is very convenient and portable. Either that or rely on someone that has one before finalizing any deal in which the wall thickness is not guaranteed by the seller. Just my opinion on that. No dog in the race.

Just examing 100 Parkers I have sold over the last 3 years, 24 of them had at least one of the two barrels with wall thickness under 23 thou. Without a lot of researching each individual gun, I can generally say I don't buy or sell any guns you all would consider unworthy at least as a sound shooter, and in general I have above average shotguns. THAT IS 25% OF THIS SAMPLING THAT PROSPECTIVE PARKER OWNERS WOULD DISMISS IF THEY WERE FOLLOWING THE 25 THOU RULE.

I guess my point is this: It seems there are quite a few folks that come to this forum as being inexperienced with buying and shooting Parkers, and are looking for sound info from members to utilize in getting started shooting and collecting Parkers. Rather than use guesstimates and opinions, why not recognize the results of strict empirical data gathered over the decades of testing provided to us by the Brits? It is certainly better than having fellows looking for a light weight Parker for the uplands simply give up because they can't find one with both tubes over 25 or even 30 thou, as some have stated in this thread. Many of those following that advice would pass over some very fine Parkers for no reason at all. And then they would have to buy Fox guns, as most of them are much lighter than like Parkers! We don't want that do we?

And again, most of the members of our association have no clue what their Parker's barrel wall thickness is. MANY of them are shooting guns that are under 25 thou, and have for decades.

A TOPIC FOR THE NEXT THREAD...CAN SOMEONE FIND THE PRESSURE CURVE DIAGRAM SHOWING HOW A SHOTGUN SHELL DEVELOPS PRESSURE UPON DETONATION, AND AS IT TRAVELS DOWN THE BARRELS UNTIL FINALLY LEAVING THE MUZZLE. I saw that diagram years ago, and it gives a graphic demonstration as to why barrels that are on the thin side forward of the midway point are not at risk of bursting. The entire pressure spike upon detonation occurs in the first 13" or so from the breech, and then is like a pussy cat going down the balance of the barrels. That would help folks understand the physics and mechanics involved.

Sorry for the long post. It is my reason for not writing. I can't say things in a few words while typing!
jay shachter is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 57 Users Say Thank You to jay shachter For Your Post:
allen newell, Bill Palmer, Bob Dombeck, Bob Jurewicz, Bob Roberts, bob weeman, Brad Boyer, Buddy Harrison, Buddy Marson, Christian Gish, Craig Budgeon, Craig Parker, Darryl Alexander, Daryl Corona, Dave Suponski, Dave Tercek, David Hamilton, David Holes, Dean Romig, Dennis V. Nix, Devan Brown, Drew Hause, E Robert Fabian, Gary Bodrato, Gary Carmichael Sr, George Blair, Greg Baehman, hugh rather, JasonPeck, Jerry Harlow, Joe Dreisch, Joe Wood, Josh Loewensteiner, Justin Julian, Ken Hill, Linn Matthews, Louis Caissie, Mark Garrett, Mark Ouellette, Mark Sjoberg, Marty Kohler, Matt Natoli, Matt Valinsky, Mills Morrison, Paul Plager, Pete Kappes, Pete Lester, Phillip Carr, randall rosenthal, Richard Flanders, Robert Rambler, Russ Jackson, scott kittredge, Steve Huffman, Thomas L. Benson Sr., William Eddleman, William Woods
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.