Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions Shotgun Shell Reloading

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Federal 7/8 loads?
Unread 10-31-2013, 10:28 AM   #1
Member
Gary
Forum Associate
 
Gary Weaver's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 87
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts

Default Federal 7/8 loads?

Anyone know the PSI of the Federal 7/8 box ammo? (think they were around 1200 fps)
i shot some RST's 2 1/2 - 1oz 8's - 1170 fps and some Federal 7/8 loads and they feel the same.. wondering if they are safe to shoot in my Damascus barrels..
(12ga).
Gary Weaver is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-01-2013, 07:53 AM   #2
Member
Paul Harm
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,774
Thanks: 44
Thanked 756 Times in 417 Posts

Default

You wouldn't blow up a damascus barrel gun with modern loads [ assuming they're safe to shoot ]. And you can't really tell how much pressure a shell has by recoil. In the formula for recoil there's nothing in it about pressure. Pressure is speed [ FPS ] times the weight of the powder, wad, and shot. Most guys like to keep pressure down around 7000psi or less in their old guns out of respect for the stocks and so they won't shoot the gun loose. It took Sherman Bell 32,000psi to blow a damascus barrel gun. Modern shells are usually no more than 11 to 13,000psi at the most. That's why we reload - to keep pressures down. The high pressure does nothing but cycle autos and deform shot.
__________________
Paul Harm
Paul Harm is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Paul Harm For Your Post:
Visit Paul Harm's homepage!
Unread 11-01-2013, 08:13 AM   #3
Member
Gary
Forum Associate
 
Gary Weaver's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 87
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts

Default

i understand that Paul.. so do you think the 7/8 loads are ok? the recoil is not bad and you can hit the birds, not like the 980's that winchester sells that are pretty slow.. the 980's pressures are around 6000.. (ok for skeet but thats about it i think).
I understand about loading your own now.. and thats a major reason, that and the cost of buying the specialty shells like RST's (even though i like them and they work well) It just gets too expensive if you shoot a lot and i do..
Gary Weaver is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-02-2013, 08:37 AM   #4
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,586
Thanks: 6,158
Thanked 8,861 Times in 4,750 Posts

Default

Paul, how do you explain the fact that loads with the identical weight of the three components you mention and identical velocity have widely different advertised pressures in loading manuals? By the way, Gary, the new Federal 7/8 ounce Top Guns are the best thing brought out by the big three since smokeless powder shells.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-02-2013, 10:08 AM   #5
Member
Double Lab
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Daryl Corona's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,318
Thanks: 15,392
Thanked 6,269 Times in 2,425 Posts

Default

Try the Fiocchi trainer 7/8oz. trainer loads. Even softer than the Federals.
Daryl Corona is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-02-2013, 10:11 AM   #6
Member
Snap Cap
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 198
Thanks: 594
Thanked 121 Times in 64 Posts

Default

Bill, I have noticed that the same hulls loaded with the same weight of shot, same powder and weight of powder charge vary considerably in pressure depending on the wad used. Even wads of the same weight cause greatly different pressure results. Perhaps some of the factors explaining this would be differing efficiency of the gas seal and blow by, different "slickness" and drag coefficients and surface area of contact between the wad and barrel wall, to name a few.
Fred Verry is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-02-2013, 10:14 AM   #7
Member
Snap Cap
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 198
Thanks: 594
Thanked 121 Times in 64 Posts

Default

I also neglected to mention the amount of wad compression pressure and crimp also cause quite a bit of variation.
Fred Verry is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-02-2013, 04:16 PM   #8
Member
Kensal Rise
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,769
Thanks: 583
Thanked 2,577 Times in 926 Posts

Default

Gary:
If you are concerned about the pressure of these Federal loads, there is a simple way to find out exactly what it is. Phone Federal. They will be happy to tell you.
John Campbell is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-02-2013, 05:57 PM   #9
Member
Paul Harm
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,774
Thanks: 44
Thanked 756 Times in 417 Posts

Default

Gary, I think Fred and Kensal both gave good advice.
__________________
Paul Harm
Paul Harm is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Paul Harm's homepage!
Unread 11-25-2013, 07:34 PM   #10
Member
Gary
Forum Associate
 
Gary Weaver's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 87
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts

Default

I've been phoning Federal for 3 days, left call back numbers each time and no reply.. doesnt seem like that question is that difficult.. guess i was wrong.
Still waiting..
Maybe someone else could try calling them and report back.. maybe they'll have better luck than me..
1-800-322-2342 - choose opt 4 Good luck.
Gary Weaver is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.