Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions Shotgun Shell Reloading

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 06-13-2014, 06:51 AM   #21
Member
William Davis
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,168
Thanks: 131
Thanked 770 Times in 416 Posts

Default

I don't know if a grabber will load 2 1/2 inch. 600 Mec's will. Main column has holes to adjust how high it rides, my 20 Mec 600 does anyway. I may set up a 600 to load 2 1/2 inch Black powder 12s for my Lifter. Seems to me single stage dedicated to special shells, Progressive for volume is the way to go.

Bill
William Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-13-2014, 07:51 PM   #22
Member
John Farrell, Charter Member #33
Forum Associate
 
John Farrell's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 335
Thanks: 100
Thanked 141 Times in 78 Posts

Default

Whenever you get into one of the older discontinued models you have to expect problems of one sort or another. One of the reasons the old ones are out of the catalog is the maker got tired of trying to correct design problems.

FWIW, back when those oldies were sold as part of the inventory, we weren't concerned with running 500-1000 reloads an hour. Everything was done at a leisurely pace and if we got 100 shells loaded while listening to Jack Armstrong, the All American boy on the radio, it was a good thing. Now we want to fill a wooden ammo box full of reloads between gin and tonics, and the oldies just can't keep up with that demand.

Speaking of old reloaders, without any kind of primer feed. Here's an old home made reloader able of doing 12 and 16 gauge on the same platform without changing any of the tooling parts. I found it at an estate sale. The builder was 93 when he passed and this was in his garage under a pile of old starters and generators. This design gives new meaning to progressive. Load some 12s for Grampa and then the boy can reload some 16s for his rabbit or pheasant gun.

Some of the parts look like those currently available from Lee Loaders. Haven't tried to reload anything on it, but one of these days . . .
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC00413.jpg (485.1 KB, 8 views)
John Farrell is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-13-2014, 10:21 PM   #23
Member
charlie cleveland
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7,794 Times in 3,967 Posts

Default

john thats a fine looking loader there you got.. charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-15-2014, 05:28 AM   #24
Member
gman
Forum Associate
 
Eric Grims's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 496
Thanks: 362
Thanked 206 Times in 105 Posts

Default

A grabber really cannot be converted to 2 1/2". A fair number of folks have wrestled with this to no practical success that I know of. MEC will make a 2 1/2" for you.
Eric Grims is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-15-2014, 12:11 PM   #25
Member
wayne goerres
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,096
Thanks: 2
Thanked 626 Times in 380 Posts

Default

I came across this grabber with three bags of shot and about four pounds of solo powder for $80.00. Couldn't pass it up. It looks pretty decent shape. Was actually looking for a 650jr.
wayne goerres is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to wayne goerres For Your Post:
Unread 06-16-2014, 05:51 PM   #26
Member
6pt-Sika
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
CraigThompson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,534
Thanks: 5,552
Thanked 7,531 Times in 3,404 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wayne goerres View Post
I came across this grabber with three bags of shot and about four pounds of solo powder for $80.00. Couldn't pass it up. It looks pretty decent shape. Was actually looking for a 650jr.
Three bags of shot wholesale are a touch over $120 . Four pounds of Solo 1000 I would think were about $90 wholesale .
CraigThompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-23-2014, 08:56 AM   #27
Member
William Davis
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,168
Thanks: 131
Thanked 770 Times in 416 Posts

Default

Got the PW 600 home and set up. Been running it beside my old 76 Grabber. Either one does the job and both loaders have there quiks. The PW seems to require less effort on the handle, and turn out a more consistent shell. Way it supports the case as they go around I suppose.

It does have the disavantage of not being able to remove a shell until it's finished. My Grabber when loading spreaders remove after I charge with shot stick the spreader in with my thumb then put the shell back in for crimping. Going to have to figure out how to do it on the 600

Ablity to cut off the shot and powder hoppers on the PW seperate is a nice feature, as is the hopper dump ablity.

Think I am going to keep the Ponseness sell off the Grabber. Keep my eyes open for a PW 375 for one off jobs like the spreader shells.

Bill
William Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-24-2014, 09:19 AM   #28
Member
Paul Harm
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,774
Thanks: 44
Thanked 756 Times in 417 Posts

Default

Gee Bill, never had or have any of the problems you listed - guess I'm just lucky. What I don't like with the PW 900 is if a mistake is made you ain't getting the shell out unless you take the press apart. With a Mec you just pull it out, no problem. My 900 is still for sale.
__________________
Paul Harm
Paul Harm is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Paul Harm's homepage!
Unread 06-24-2014, 10:15 AM   #29
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,586
Thanks: 6,158
Thanked 8,861 Times in 4,750 Posts

Default

Bill, use the PC Post wad eliminates the problem of inserting spreader thingys.
Bill Murphy is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-24-2014, 10:17 AM   #30
Member
William Davis
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,168
Thanks: 131
Thanked 770 Times in 416 Posts

Default

Could be just my Grabber it’s real old. That lack of shell removal is a disadvantage for the PW. Get a problem you have to let the shell cycle through to eject while remembering which one it was so you don't throw powder or shot in it.

Thanks for the offer on the 900 but will pass. Now that I have the 600 running for volume loads found a nice PW 375 set up for 12 & 20 . I don't load much 20 so it will serve. Will use the 12 side when I am doing special jobs like Spreaders or trying new powders and loads. Like to try ¾ oz for my Damascus 1 Frame GH without changing over the progressive

Found a quick sale for my two MEC's yesterday am committed to PW now

Bill
William Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.