Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Parker Hammer Guns

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Grade 2 valuation?
Unread 07-21-2013, 02:23 PM   #1
Member
Wild Skies
PGCA Member
 
Greg Baehman's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,245
Thanks: 1,149
Thanked 3,617 Times in 988 Posts

Default Grade 2 valuation?

An aquaintance owns this 12-ga. Parker Bros. Grade 2 hammergun with 30" damascus barrels that is looking for an approximate value of what it's worth. I told him I'd ask the experts.

All S/N's match. The barrels are in great shape, no dents or pitting, good bores. Some color remains on the frame. Notice the small chunk of metal missing on the backside of the toplever (how did that ever happen?) and engraving missing on the side of the left hammer. The stock checkering is in good condition, but the forend checkering is quite worn. The butt stock is a couple of shades darker than the forend, measures 1 1/2" x 2 3/8" x 14 3/8" to a DHBP, there is no initial shield. In your opinion is this this a refinished or replacement stock? (I wasn't able to pull the trigger guard.)

What's your educated guess of what it's worth? NOTE: If you feel uncomfortable posting a guesstimate on a public forum a PM would work just as well!

TIA,
Greg
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Parker Grade 2 hammergun 001.jpg (553.4 KB, 21 views)
File Type: jpg Parker Grade 2 hammergun 002.jpg (550.5 KB, 16 views)
File Type: jpg Parker Grade 2 hammergun 003.jpg (545.4 KB, 10 views)
File Type: jpg Parker Grade 2 hammergun 005.jpg (519.4 KB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg Parker Grade 2 hammergun 006.jpg (547.3 KB, 3 views)
File Type: jpg Parker Grade 2 hammergun 007.jpg (538.2 KB, 8 views)
File Type: jpg Parker Grade 2 hammergun 008.jpg (540.7 KB, 11 views)
__________________
Wild Skies
Since 1951
Greg Baehman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-21-2013, 09:10 PM   #2
Member
charlie cleveland
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7,795 Times in 3,967 Posts

Default

it looks like a nice gun i would guess its value at 1800 to 2200...charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to charlie cleveland For Your Post:
Unread 07-21-2013, 09:22 PM   #3
Member
Wild Skies
PGCA Member
 
Greg Baehman's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,245
Thanks: 1,149
Thanked 3,617 Times in 988 Posts

Default

Thank you Charlie.

How about the stock, do you or anyone else have an opinion on whether it is original refinished or a replacement?
__________________
Wild Skies
Since 1951
Greg Baehman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-21-2013, 10:32 PM   #4
Member
Autumn Daze
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Suponski's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,888
Thanks: 4,375
Thanked 4,048 Times in 1,727 Posts

Default

Greg,IMHO that stock is a fairly nicely done replacement. The nose of the comb is not correct for that gun for one thing.
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker
Dave Suponski is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dave Suponski For Your Post:
Unread 07-22-2013, 05:44 AM   #5
Member
Pa SxS
Research Chairman
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Chuck Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 1,207
Thanked 4,976 Times in 1,422 Posts

Default

I agree that the butt stock is a replacement but very nicely done, can't tell with the forend but if it has a mullard border, it's probably original. Value wise, I'd put it at $1500, just because of the replacement stock and what looks like a replacement hammer of Parker origin.
Chuck Bishop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post:
Unread 07-22-2013, 01:40 PM   #6
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,594
Thanks: 6,160
Thanked 8,874 Times in 4,756 Posts

Default

Maybe someone ground the hammer so the gun would open with the right hammer cocked. I would have bent it, but the "chunk" works just as well.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-22-2013, 01:49 PM   #7
Member
Wild Skies
PGCA Member
 
Greg Baehman's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,245
Thanks: 1,149
Thanked 3,617 Times in 988 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Murphy View Post
Maybe someone ground the hammer so the gun would open with the right hammer cocked. I would have bent it, but the "chunk" works just as well.
Good in theory Bill, but this is a fishtail toplever. This particular gun can be opened and closed with the right hammer cocked without the toplever touching the hammer.
__________________
Wild Skies
Since 1951
Greg Baehman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-22-2013, 03:20 PM   #8
Member
Mills
PGCA Lifetime Member
Since 3rd Grade
 
Mills Morrison's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 10,315
Thanks: 14,215
Thanked 12,345 Times in 4,421 Posts

Default

The good news about the replaced stock is that you don't have to worry about the oil-soaked, cracked or worse stocks you usually find on these old hammer guns.
Mills Morrison is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-24-2013, 04:00 PM   #9
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,586
Thanks: 477
Thanked 17,550 Times in 4,623 Posts

Default

Buttstock surely looks like a replacement. Checkering pattern is not correct either on the wrist. And it looks like it lacks borders. But hard to tell. And the hammers are mismatched. The right one looks correct, left one is a bit odd for a Parker.
It looks like the gun has attractive engraving, which is not always seen on grade 2 guns. And it appears to have a good amount of color remaining.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 07-24-2013, 07:45 PM   #10
Member
Wild Skies
PGCA Member
 
Greg Baehman's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,245
Thanks: 1,149
Thanked 3,617 Times in 988 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Dudley View Post
. . . And the hammers are mismatched. The right one looks correct, left one is a bit odd for a Parker.
Other than the left hammer lacking the engraving, what is "odd for a Parker" about it? It appears to be a mirror image of the right hammer save for the engraving.
__________________
Wild Skies
Since 1951
Greg Baehman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.