Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 09-17-2013, 03:16 PM   #11
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,639
Thanks: 35,618
Thanked 33,235 Times in 12,376 Posts

Default

Hmmmm....

I see what you're talking about Pete. I sure wish we had this gun in hand to be able to examine it closely.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 09-17-2013, 03:24 PM   #12
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,866
Thanks: 1,645
Thanked 4,804 Times in 1,370 Posts

Default

Interestingly enough the same line is present on the DelGrego restored Trojan currently featured on the PGCA web site's home page.
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
Stock split
Unread 09-17-2013, 03:32 PM   #13
Member
Erick Hodge
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Default Stock split

Please pardon my ignorance but I am looking for the split. Please help me locate it.

There seems to be a gap to the right of the tang that might would indicate a crack at the back of the tang. I have not bought it. The seller is swearing that the colors are original but I always doubt parker colors.

He also claims 90% but I don't see it. Especially with the fore arm damage and a possible stock split.
Erick Hodge is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-17-2013, 03:36 PM   #14
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,866
Thanks: 1,645
Thanked 4,804 Times in 1,370 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Hodge View Post
Please pardon my ignorance but I am looking for the split. Please help me locate it.

There seems to be a gap to the right of the tang that might would indicate a crack at the back of the tang. I have not bought it. The seller is swearing that the colors are original but I always doubt parker colors.

He also claims 90% but I don't see it. Especially with the fore arm damage and a possible stock split.
The little round black dot on both cheeks of the stock is indicative of a repair for a split stock head.
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-17-2013, 04:06 PM   #15
Member
Erick Hodge
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Default

I see that!

Thank you!

I am assuming this is about a $3500 gun?
Erick Hodge is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-17-2013, 04:15 PM   #16
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,639
Thanks: 35,618
Thanked 33,235 Times in 12,376 Posts

Default

That would be between you and the seller. He hasn't reduced his price in about two years. Apparently he is convinced it is original. I suspect he bought it as "original".
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-17-2013, 04:34 PM   #17
Member
MarketHunter
PGCA Member
 
Destry L. Hoffard's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,153
Thanks: 598
Thanked 4,035 Times in 1,168 Posts

Default

If a gun was shot or used enough to get a stock split I'd think it wouldn't have case colors quite that strong. I suppose it could have gotten damaged the first day the guy took it out but that's a stretch......

Destry
__________________
I was as virtuously given as a gentleman need to be; virtuous enough; swore little; diced not above seven times a week; went to a bawdy-house once in a quarter--of an hour; paid money that I borrowed, three of four times; lived well and in good compass: and now I live out of all order, out of all compass. Falstaff - Henry IV
Destry L. Hoffard is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-17-2013, 04:40 PM   #18
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,639
Thanks: 35,618
Thanked 33,235 Times in 12,376 Posts

Default

Right Destry, and the fact that there is significant oil staining in the wood supports what you said. Especially in the forend wood which is probably original to the gun.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-17-2013, 04:53 PM   #19
Member
ed good
On Vacation

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 787
Thanks: 205
Thanked 203 Times in 124 Posts

Default

perhaps a research letter would reveal some more info?

and, if the receiver has been rehardened, then that opens up a can of worms, re: the single trigger...parker single triggers are suspect enough without introducing the potential problems of receiver warpage and the necessity to refit the trigger and related parts...

but a nice looking gun, never the less.
ed good is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-17-2013, 04:59 PM   #20
Member
ed good
On Vacation

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 787
Thanks: 205
Thanked 203 Times in 124 Posts

Default

is there a thru bolt length wise in the forend? if not, then that is a big clue that the beaver tail forend is not factory.
ed good is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.