Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
My first Parker
Unread 01-15-2024, 08:30 PM   #1
Member
Todd Bullock
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 3
Thanks: 2
Thanked 20 Times in 3 Posts

Default My first Parker

Hi everyone my name is Todd Bullock

Just purchase my first Parker and would like to learn more about it.Everything leads me back to this form for answers.

Ser#208682 - 1924 GH grade

Is the checkering above the triggers normal?
Is the butt plate correct?

Thanks for allowing me to be a member
Attached Images
File Type: jpg pakerside.jpg (242.0 KB, 45 views)
File Type: jpg parkercheckside.jpg (352.4 KB, 48 views)
File Type: jpg buttplate.jpg (343.6 KB, 18 views)
File Type: jpg parkercloseside.jpg (392.2 KB, 25 views)
File Type: jpg pakergrade.jpg (337.6 KB, 13 views)
File Type: jpg pakerbarrel.jpg (296.7 KB, 24 views)
Todd Bullock is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-15-2024, 09:03 PM   #2
Member
Harold Pickens
PGCA Member
 
Harold Lee Pickens's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,635
Thanks: 2,130
Thanked 7,829 Times in 2,017 Posts

Default

Congrats on your first Parker Todd! A 1 frame 12 ga is desirable. No, the butt plate configuration is not correct, and the checkering on the cheeks was probably added later. How long are the barrels? I do like the gun, however.
__________________
"How kind it is that most of us will never know when we have fired our last shot"--Nash Buckingham
Harold Lee Pickens is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Harold Lee Pickens For Your Post:
Unread 01-15-2024, 09:26 PM   #3
Member
J. Scott Hanes
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 299
Thanks: 2,099
Thanked 444 Times in 175 Posts

Default

Very nice wood; technically too nice for a GHE (as stated above, the checkering on the side panel is not consistent for the grade) but the ''1" frame is quite rare. The large forend is a bonus to me. It appears the barrels are either 26 or 28". Have you measured the chokes? It would be helpful to see the left side details you show of the right side and a closeup of the muzzle end; rib and front.

That is a very nice gun no matter what. A great find for a "first" Parker!
J. Scott Hanes is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to J. Scott Hanes For Your Post:
Unread 01-16-2024, 07:28 AM   #4
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,585
Thanks: 476
Thanked 17,541 Times in 4,621 Posts

Default

There are a lot of things suspect about the gun. The buttplate has a spacer added to it. the forend is not original it would have had a splinter forend. The gun does not have the proper forend lug for a beavertail and the style of the forend wood is not at all correct for a factory forend. The wood has been refinished for sure. The cheek checkering looks of factory quality, but it is not in line with the norm for the grade. The lack of proper borders on the wrist checkering suggests a low quality recut, or maybe a later remington stock replacement as the style of border present was only used on very late remington made guns.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 01-16-2024, 07:34 AM   #5
Member
George "Scott" Davis
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 770
Thanks: 1,700
Thanked 1,338 Times in 364 Posts

Default

My first suggestion is submit the paperwork to get factory records on you new Parker. Hopefully many more, Congratulations
George Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-16-2024, 08:54 AM   #6
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,592
Thanks: 6,160
Thanked 8,871 Times in 4,755 Posts

Default

Don't expect much information in a PGCA letter. The gun was made after the era of "order books". However, I order a letter on all my Parkers, just in case.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post:
Unread 01-16-2024, 11:09 AM   #7
Member
todd allen
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,150
Thanks: 1,926
Thanked 3,278 Times in 1,135 Posts

Default

She is a beauty, much like the girl I dated out of high school with non-original hair color.
I wouldn't kick that gun out of the safe for eating crackers.
todd allen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to todd allen For Your Post:
Unread 01-16-2024, 12:50 PM   #8
Member
winplumber
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,632
Thanks: 1,758
Thanked 639 Times in 404 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Dudley View Post
There are a lot of things suspect about the gun. The buttplate has a spacer added to it. the forend is not original it would have had a splinter forend. The gun does not have the proper forend lug for a beavertail and the style of the forend wood is not at all correct for a factory forend. The wood has been refinished for sure. The cheek checkering looks of factory quality, but it is not in line with the norm for the grade. The lack of proper borders on the wrist checkering suggests a low quality recut, or maybe a later remington stock replacement as the style of border present was only used on very late remington made guns.
Brian for the sake of Education on my part which photo can you tell that the gun doesnt have the proper forend lug for the beavertail forend?
Steve Huffman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Steve Huffman For Your Post:
Unread 01-16-2024, 03:13 PM   #9
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,585
Thanks: 476
Thanked 17,541 Times in 4,621 Posts

Default

From the gunbroker listing when this gun was sold a week or so ago.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 01-16-2024, 05:52 PM   #10
Member
Jreed
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 148
Thanks: 37
Thanked 136 Times in 51 Posts

Default

Todd, you have a beautiful Parker. I saw this same gun on gun broker last week. While it does have a few things that are not original, don't let that keep you from enjoying it. It's a great looking classic Parker that you should be proud to own. If it fits you, and you shoot it well then enjoy it for what it is.
John Reed is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to John Reed For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.