Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions General Discussions about Other Fine Doubles

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
the 1901 1887 lever action shotgun
Unread 11-22-2014, 04:18 PM   #1
Member
bill stone
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Default the 1901 1887 lever action shotgun

Guy's,help,advice please,have a 1901 10g lever action,lovely condition,had the usual number 7 shot going through it,was talking to guy at the club and said as a full choke never shoot 00buck? true or not? Or is this rule just for the steel? thanks for any thoughts on this
bill stone is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-22-2014, 04:56 PM   #2
Member
Roundsworth
PGCA Member
 
Mark Landskov's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,452
Thanks: 1,516
Thanked 561 Times in 311 Posts

Default

As far as I know, steel shot can be an issue through a full choke. At least, that is what I recall reading over the years. If rifled slugs were okay with a full choke, 00 Buck should be okay. I think lots of shooters grew up listening to arguments over which is better, the 30-30 or 32 Special (or other similar comparisons). I have tried to enter into discussions like that, but ended up walking away.
__________________
GMC(SW)-USN, Retired
'Earnest Will'
'Desert Shield'
'Desert Storm'
'Southern Watch'
Mark Landskov is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-22-2014, 08:08 PM   #3
Member
charlie cleveland
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7,794 Times in 3,967 Posts

Default

full choke is recommended on a new remington box of 00 buck i just bought wednesday..charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to charlie cleveland For Your Post:
Unread 11-23-2014, 10:39 AM   #4
Member
bill stone
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Default

Thanks guys,
bill stone is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-24-2014, 12:51 AM   #5
Member
Mike Franzen
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Mike Franzen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,866
Thanks: 1,258
Thanked 4,379 Times in 1,318 Posts

Default

I'm thinking I would like one of those old Winchester 10's
Mike Franzen is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Mike Franzen's homepage!
Unread 11-24-2014, 11:49 AM   #6
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,592
Thanks: 6,160
Thanked 8,870 Times in 4,754 Posts

Default

I would not be afraid to shoot buckshot in my 1901 Winchester. What brand and load of ammunition are you using in yours?
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
1901 v 1887
Unread 01-29-2015, 06:23 PM   #7
Member
Allen Peterson
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 106
Thanks: 635
Thanked 137 Times in 48 Posts

Default 1901 v 1887

This is kind of off topic but were there substantial changes between the two models from black powder era to smokeless time?
Allen Peterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-01-2015, 02:03 AM   #8
Member
6pt-Sika
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
CraigThompson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,538
Thanks: 5,552
Thanked 7,533 Times in 3,406 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen Peterson View Post
This is kind of off topic but were there substantial changes between the two models from black powder era to smokeless time?
From everything I've read about the two models as well as I can remember the 1901 was claimed to be stronger . Now the reason for which this claim was made I honestly do not remember .
CraigThompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-01-2015, 07:44 AM   #9
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,100
Thanks: 2,946
Thanked 11,547 Times in 3,106 Posts

Default

Other than a trigger block, for safety reasons, added to the 1901, there were no mechanical differences, and the serial numbers of the 1901 was just a continuation of the 1889. The only other differences were mostly choke and gauge marking.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-02-2015, 08:15 AM   #10
Member
Bill Zachow
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 617
Thanks: 478
Thanked 408 Times in 205 Posts

Default

You could get the 1887 with damascus barrels. I am not sure if the 1901 had that ophtion. The 1887 could be had with 3 grades of damascus--good, fine, and finest. I once owned serial 13, 1887 with fine damascus barrels in 12 gauge. Did a writeup for the WACA magazine about 20 years ago on the gun. Neat guns. Just for the hell of it, about 5 years ago, I purchased a Chinese replica of the 1887. Made for cowboy action shooting. Extremely well made gun, produced on cnc machining. I do not think they are made any more.
Bill Zachow is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Zachow For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.