Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions Shotgun Shell Reloading

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
PT1044 v. SP-10
Unread 06-25-2021, 07:29 PM   #1
Member
Victor Wasylyna
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Victor Wasylyna's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 559
Thanks: 1,506
Thanked 1,473 Times in 333 Posts

Default PT1044 v. SP-10

Today I was sorting through my reloading components and found a bag of PT1044 wads. I must have purchased this bag before finalizing some nice short ten loads using the SP-10 wad. Now that components are in short supply, I am wondering if I can swap the PT1044 for the SP-10. Anyone have any relevant pressure data/insight?

-Victor
Victor Wasylyna is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-26-2021, 07:24 AM   #2
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,866
Thanks: 1,645
Thanked 4,804 Times in 1,370 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor Wasylyna View Post
Today I was sorting through my reloading components and found a bag of PT1044 wads. I must have purchased this bag before finalizing some nice short ten loads using the SP-10 wad. Now that components are in short supply, I am wondering if I can swap the PT1044 for the SP-10. Anyone have any relevant pressure data/insight?

-Victor
I found very few tested loads using that wad which I believe has been sold with other names in the past; Deci-Max and VP100. I have substituted it for an SP10 with the Fed hull 1 1/8 ox 19 grain Red Dot load without issue. Pressure on that load being 6700 psi leaves some room to make such a deviation in my mind. Dimensions are extremely close to the SP10. I think I had to use just a little bit more filler to get a proper crimp. Worked fine.
__________________
Progress is the mortal enemy of the Outdoorsman.
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Pete Lester For Your Post:
Unread 06-26-2021, 01:04 PM   #3
Member
Paul Harm
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,774
Thanks: 44
Thanked 756 Times in 417 Posts

Default

I to have switched from one to the other numerous times over the years without any problems. As Pete said, loading shells at low pressures allows one to deviate without worry.
__________________
Paul Harm
Paul Harm is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Paul Harm For Your Post:
Visit Paul Harm's homepage!
Unread 06-26-2021, 09:46 PM   #4
Member
6pt-Sika
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
CraigThompson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,538
Thanks: 5,552
Thanked 7,533 Times in 3,406 Posts

Default

Out of curiosity the PT1044 is the Italian Gualandi wad correct ? I think I might have ordered some , I know I’ve got them for the 8 and 16 .
__________________
Parker’s , 6.5mm’s , Mannlicher Schoenauer’s and my family in the Philippines !
CraigThompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.