Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Hunting with Parkers

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 02-22-2014, 08:26 PM   #11
Member
Blue Collar
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 113
Thanks: 27
Thanked 129 Times in 32 Posts

Default

Dean, they are, but non-toxic shot is not a requirement for all Migratory Bird Treaty birds. Dove for example are another.
__________________
"You can observe a lot by just watching" - Yogi Berra
Russ Lindsay is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-22-2014, 08:32 PM   #12
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,640
Thanks: 35,621
Thanked 33,238 Times in 12,378 Posts

Default

Thanks Russ, I knew about woodcock and dove but wasn't aware that snipe are excluded as well.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-22-2014, 08:47 PM   #13
Member
Blue Collar
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 113
Thanks: 27
Thanked 129 Times in 32 Posts

Default

I believe they make the distinction between waterfowl and other types of migratory birds, such as we have referenced. Non-toxic shot being required for waterfowl and all birds they place in that category and any shot type for all migratory birds that are not part of the "waterfowl" category.
__________________
"You can observe a lot by just watching" - Yogi Berra
Russ Lindsay is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Russ Lindsay For Your Post:
Unread 02-23-2014, 08:19 AM   #14
Member
Kevin McCormack
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,018
Thanks: 1,237
Thanked 3,619 Times in 1,024 Posts

Default

In many cases it is ultimately up to the State as to requiring the use of non-toxic shot for non-waterfowl migratory birds. For many years after the imposition of the lead shot ban on migratory waterfowl, the State of New Jersey allowed the use of lead shot for railbird hunting in its wonderful riverine marshes. After early teal season opened, the lead ban went into effect in those areas as well.

This was a great benefit, and much to the state's credit, since to my knowledge at the time of the ban the smallest shot size available in non-toxic loads was #7. Of course the wonderful old loads for the tiny birds in #10 or #11 (#12s 'pulped' the meat too much) lead were just the ticket, regardless of gauge. (My rail hunting mentor's favorite quip was, "No choke is too open and no shot size is too small").

Eventually, the State succumbed to pressure from the 'green' groups and extended the lead shot ban a few years ago to include railbird hunting as well. We owe much to the NJ DNR and State waterfowl management programs who supported and enforced this exemption for the use of lead shot in railbird hunting; it gave us almost 20 years of being able to use lead for rail shooting after the early 1980's ban(s).
Kevin McCormack is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kevin McCormack For Your Post:
Unread 02-23-2014, 09:03 AM   #15
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,640
Thanks: 35,621
Thanked 33,238 Times in 12,378 Posts

Default

Good information Kevin. It is unfortunate that there is no non-toxic shot made in the smaller sizes, but I guess snipe shooters are too few and far between to make it a viable enterprise for the manufacturers... and so goes another generation of hunters to the history of sport-shooting in America and "the way we were".
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-23-2014, 09:35 AM   #16
Member
charlie cleveland
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7,794 Times in 3,967 Posts

Default

well said dean..... charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-23-2014, 10:29 AM   #17
Member
Brush Buster
PGCA Member
Second Badge
 
Russ Jackson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,211
Thanks: 3,251
Thanked 3,566 Times in 1,099 Posts

Default

[QUOTE=Dean Romig;131692]Good information Kevin. It is unfortunate that there is no non-toxic shot made in the smaller sizes, QUOTE]

I agree Dean ,I am assumimg you are talking about Small Bores ,410, 28 etc. and I hope RST or some one is working on this ,as eventually all upland hunting may require the use of a Non Toxic shot ! Sad to say I think the writing is already on the wall !
Russ Jackson is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-23-2014, 03:42 PM   #18
Member
Jack Kuzepski
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 326
Thanks: 366
Thanked 176 Times in 116 Posts

Default

Kevin,

I was talking to a gamewarden in NJ not too far from Mauricetown last year about woodcock hunting. He told me about some young guys he checked and busted for hunting woodcock that season using lead shot. So NJ is going more no-tox than a little!

Jack Kuzepski

Jack Kuzepski
Jack Kuzepski is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-23-2014, 04:29 PM   #19
Member
Mills
PGCA Lifetime Member
Since 3rd Grade
 
Mills Morrison's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 10,315
Thanks: 14,215
Thanked 12,345 Times in 4,421 Posts

Default

In Georgia, it is legal as long as it is not against the Migratory Bird Treaty. SC does not allow 10 gauges on WMA's for waterfowl hunts, which blows me away, but they are otherwise very liberal (errr maybe conservative is a better adjective here) in their game laws.
Mills Morrison is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.