Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Parker Restoration

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 03-02-2021, 09:30 AM   #21
Member
Bob Jurewicz
PGCA Member
 
Bob Jurewicz's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,466
Thanks: 1,556
Thanked 1,984 Times in 565 Posts

Default

After the last two replies by Dean and Brian. I looked at a CHE 16 GA made in 1905 that I knew was returned to Parker in 1909 (PGCA Letter) because the owner complained of it shooting low. It has the 1910 plate and bolt. Further, I went to the Parker Story and found on page 132, second paragraph, a possible explanation addressing the owner's complaint that may have been rectified by the new Bolting System. "The flat surfaces of the bolt and bite were designed to 'prevent lift," according to Hayes's description. No information has been located to indicate whether this 'lift' had been a problem with Parker Brothers guns or whether this was a potential problem that Hayes envisioned."
Interesting!
Bob Jurewicz
Bob Jurewicz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bob Jurewicz For Your Post:
Unread 03-02-2021, 09:40 AM   #22
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,578
Thanks: 476
Thanked 17,518 Times in 4,619 Posts

Default

I wrote a pretty extensive analysis on the different variations of Parker bolts and bites in Parker Pages maybe 5 years ago now.

Parker guns started out with a straight bite with the first hammer guns. This required a precision fit but allowed no way to compensate for wear over time. Then the tapered bite was used for many years on hammer guns and also hammerless guns. in 1905 the decision was made to use a hardened plate in the bite which would be replaceable. This design brought back the straight bite. The 1910 design combined both the straight and the tapered bites into one design. Straight on the sides and tapered in the middle. Both designs have their own advantages.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 03-03-2021, 11:31 AM   #23
Member
Brett Hoop
PGCA Member
 
Brett Hoop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 592
Thanks: 1,591
Thanked 899 Times in 370 Posts

Default

Brian

I well recall that article. And what I remember is that it was one of the most informative that I had read before or since. Made me an even bigger fan of Hayes.
Brett Hoop is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-03-2021, 12:15 PM   #24
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,618
Thanks: 35,563
Thanked 33,191 Times in 12,368 Posts

Default

Hayes was an engineering genius.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.