Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Parker Reproductions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 10-19-2016, 03:20 PM   #11
Member
Victor Wasylyna
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Victor Wasylyna's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 556
Thanks: 1,505
Thanked 1,469 Times in 331 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Baehman View Post
Victor, you may be able to get some meaningful advice if you can show us pics the gun, showing the species of wood, whether your gun is stocked in Juglans Hindsii or Juglans Regia and how the grain flows through the wrist area.
See this thread:

http://parkerguns.org/forums/showthread.php?t=18368
Victor Wasylyna is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-19-2016, 08:21 PM   #12
Member
Wild Skies
PGCA Member
 
Greg Baehman's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,242
Thanks: 1,149
Thanked 3,617 Times in 988 Posts

Default

Victor, I'm sure you realize you don't have the ideal heavy duck and goose waterfowler there. Your gun with 2 3/4" chambers and weighing just 6 3/4 lbs. is at a disadvantage when targeting the species you're after. Will it work? Yes, in a pinch with the right load and a disciplined and judicious choice of the shots you take. In regards to the pressure, your gun was designed and built to shoot any 2 3/4" load that falls within SAAMI specs. You're concerned with pressure somehow damaging your gun's stock, however; it's actually recoil that you need to be concerned with. Pressure has very little to do with recoil. Because of the relatively light weight of your gun I would choose a load that throws 1 1/8 oz. of shot at less than 1350fps. By doing so, I believe that the recoil would be manageable for both you and the gun.

I would be interested in what others have to say.
__________________
Wild Skies
Since 1951
Greg Baehman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Greg Baehman For Your Post:
Unread 10-19-2016, 08:29 PM   #13
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,618
Thanks: 35,563
Thanked 33,188 Times in 12,368 Posts

Default

I agree with that Greg.






.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-19-2016, 09:18 PM   #14
Member
Victor Wasylyna
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Victor Wasylyna's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 556
Thanks: 1,505
Thanked 1,469 Times in 331 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Baehman View Post
Victor, I'm sure you realize you don't have the ideal heavy duck and goose waterfowler there. Your gun with 2 3/4" chambers and weighing just 6 3/4 lbs. is at a disadvantage when targeting the species you're after. Will it work? Yes, in a pinch with the right load and a disciplined and judicious choice of the shots you take. In regards to the pressure, your gun was designed and built to shoot any 2 3/4" load that falls within SAAMI specs. You're concerned with pressure somehow damaging your gun's stock, however; it's actually recoil that you need to be concerned with. Pressure has very little to do with recoil. Because of the relatively light weight of your gun I would choose a load that throws 1 1/8 oz. of shot at less than 1350fps. By doing so, I believe that the recoil would be manageable for both you and the gun.

I would be interested in what others have to say.
Good point, Wild Skies. Chamber pressure is relevant to barrels, while recoil/energy is more specifically relevant to other components of the overall shotgun. If you consider 1.125 oz at 1350 fps a good ceiling, then (per my calculations) 1.25 oz at 1280 fps would be an equivalent energy load. I think I'll shoot for 1.25 oz at 1200 to 1250 fps, which will work great for my short term needs (woodies over decoys).
Victor Wasylyna is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-22-2016, 09:10 AM   #15
Member
George M. Purtill Member #28
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
George M. Purtill's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,342
Thanks: 2,039
Thanked 2,291 Times in 861 Posts

Default

Greg seems right on.
Victor- for your purposes, I would search for a Steel Shot Special. I have one and it is my waterfowl gun of choice. I can stick any shell I can buy down its chambers and not worry(except for the 3.5 inch cannon shells). And the recoil is nothing.
George M. Purtill is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to George M. Purtill For Your Post:
Unread 10-22-2016, 10:32 AM   #16
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,088
Thanks: 2,934
Thanked 11,516 Times in 3,096 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George M. Purtill View Post
search for a Steel Shot Special. I have one .
eh hmm, one?
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-22-2016, 09:42 PM   #17
Member
Victor Wasylyna
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Victor Wasylyna's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 556
Thanks: 1,505
Thanked 1,469 Times in 331 Posts

Default

Tomorrow is day two of our duck season (Ohio's North Zone). I will be shooting factory Hevi-Shot loads pushing 1.25 ounces at 1300 fps. Will see how it goes and use as a benchmark for future loads.

Today I shot the DH 10 gauge. Boy, that was fun!
Victor Wasylyna is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.