Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 04-05-2023, 05:07 PM   #21
Member
Pa SxS
Research Chairman
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Chuck Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,881
Thanks: 1,210
Thanked 5,006 Times in 1,429 Posts

Default

From the 1910 catalog
Attached Images
File Type: jpg grips.jpg (112.2 KB, 8 views)
Chuck Bishop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post:
Unread 04-05-2023, 05:10 PM   #22
Member
Dean Weber
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dean Weber's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 430
Thanks: 309
Thanked 1,266 Times in 219 Posts

Default

Pursuant to Dean R.'s comments about "ball grips" as opposed to Mike's comments about ball grips.......ahem.

My lifters with true ball grips are called pistol grips within the letters. If we recognize grip structures changed over time (ball, capped, round) and yet pistol grip is used in my letters for most of these from the 1800s to 1940s (exception is where capped pistol grip is called out). Yet the grip styles/structure are very different.

We also know that styles of comb structure did change over time even within the lifter period. Whether the names changed with them seems not as clear. Further, I have never received a letter calling out the comb structure even though I have a couple which would be called full or trap comb.

Obviously, I don't have access to Parker records, but I suspect comb was not documented in the same manner/frequency as grip structure. No matter the singer performing the act.......
__________________
Follow a good dog while carrying a fine shotgun and you will never be uninspired.
Dean Weber is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dean Weber For Your Post:
Unread 04-05-2023, 05:18 PM   #23
Member
Pa SxS
Research Chairman
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Chuck Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,881
Thanks: 1,210
Thanked 5,006 Times in 1,429 Posts

Default

I only put in the research letter what either the order book or stock book says. The order books only rarely will specify CPG, they only say p.g. or straight. The stock books do say either straight, pistol grip, or capped pistol grip so if there is no stock book for the gun, the letter will say pistol grip even though it's a capped pistol grip. I may have done a letter where a Monty Carlo stock was indicated but it would be extremely rare. You can assume a Monty Carlo stock by the 3 dimensions of drops if they are listed.
Chuck Bishop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post:
Unread 04-05-2023, 05:22 PM   #24
Member
Dean Weber
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dean Weber's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 430
Thanks: 309
Thanked 1,266 Times in 219 Posts

Default

Chuck,
After writing about 50 of my letters and likely 1000s by now, how often do you see the comb type called out? I suspect seldom, as the books are only non-standard combs and therefore no need to document regularly unless the comb is remarkable. I dunno. Just spitballin.
__________________
Follow a good dog while carrying a fine shotgun and you will never be uninspired.
Dean Weber is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dean Weber For Your Post:
Unread 04-05-2023, 06:10 PM   #25
Member
Rino Grassa
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 49
Thanks: 58
Thanked 60 Times in 25 Posts

Default

My 1903 16ga VH Letters the stock as " 1/2 Pistol Grip
Rino Grassa is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rino Grassa For Your Post:
Unread 04-05-2023, 07:03 PM   #26
Member
Steiner
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 776
Thanks: 6,102
Thanked 2,133 Times in 486 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Bishop View Post
I looked thru my copies of Parker catalogs and prior to the 1910 catalog, Parker only listed straight or pistol grip. The pistol grip would include capped pistol grips, round knob pistol grips, and ball grips. Ball grips were on the early hammer guns and looked like a bulb. Parker did use the term "ball" on their later .410 guns. Starting with the 1910 catalog, they used the terms straight, pistol grip (includes both CPG and round), 1/2 pistol grip, and Monte Carlo.
VH 28 #234418

IMG-8257 (1).jpg
IMG-8254 (1).jpg
Dan Steingraber is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dan Steingraber For Your Post:
Unread 04-05-2023, 07:06 PM   #27
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,693
Thanks: 35,807
Thanked 33,383 Times in 12,415 Posts

Default

Thanks Chuck -
I wish Parker Bros. And Remington had been more consistant in identifying the style of grip and comb.






.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 04-06-2023, 07:54 AM   #28
Member
mobirdhunter
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Garry L Gordon's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,785
Thanks: 13,485
Thanked 9,865 Times in 3,154 Posts

Default

Thanks to all who have contributed information here! The original question was concerning the Parker comb variations. Dean W.'s comments echo my own regarding the terminology used...on the apparently rare instances where it is used.

I think the only way to get any sense of what kinds of combs Parker would produce is linked to those few instances where it's mentioned in the records. I don't see references in the catalogs.

Dean shared with me a case where a gun had a larger comb, but it was not mentioned in the research letter (and so, the records). The comb on his mid-1920s gun is exactly like my 1924 gun (for which no records exist). Others have noted mention in their letters, and as I noted earlier, I have one that is specified as having a "medium full" comb.

So, if there are letters out there with mention of the comb, please consider responding to this thread. Short of going through all of the records, I can't see a better way of getting at this question.

Thanks!!
__________________
“Every day I wonder how many things I am dead wrong about.”
― Jim Harrison
"'I promise you,' he said, 'on my word of honor, I won't die on the opening of the bird season.'" -- Robert Ruark (from The Old Man and the Boy)
Garry L Gordon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Garry L Gordon For Your Post:
Unread 04-06-2023, 02:21 PM   #29
Member
Pa SxS
Research Chairman
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Chuck Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,881
Thanks: 1,210
Thanked 5,006 Times in 1,429 Posts

Default

Dan, your grip type in the stock book is listed as a 1/2 pistol grip. I was wrong about the ball grips on .410. In the last stock book I found ball grips listed for all the gauges. I'm guessing the word ball is the same as a 1/2 pistol grip or what we also call a "round grip". I know this is all confusing, but just know that I put in the research letter exactly what the records show.
Chuck Bishop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post:
Unread 04-06-2023, 02:30 PM   #30
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,693
Thanks: 35,807
Thanked 33,383 Times in 12,415 Posts

Default

It seems, after all the examples shown here and the opinions expressed, that the description of the type of pistol grip a gun was made with really didn't have an official name as would have been dictated by the front office but rather were described by the stockmaker or the person actually recording the gun's manufacturing specs...

Would it were that were otherwise.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.