|
01-03-2012, 11:07 PM | #13 | ||||||
|
I've gotta say I'm pretty impressed.
Please let us know how the POI on each tube compares with your expectations. |
||||||
01-04-2012, 02:04 AM | #14 | ||||||
|
Forend gap? c'mon guys, the forend to barrel gap has to either get larger or the barrels are so thick walled with a .410 internal and the same as the 28g outside. That would be rediculous. Why is this even a question? It's gonna be .550 minus .410, divided by 2 difference.
|
||||||
01-04-2012, 11:08 AM | #15 | ||||||
|
Agreed, but I'd still like to see a pic. I was interested in a set, years ago when CSM advertised them, but refrained when I couldn't get them to send pics. Lots of $ for a possible unsightly gap between the bbls and forend. I will say that they look nice in the pics Pat posted though.
|
||||||
01-04-2012, 05:38 PM | #16 | |||||||
|
Quote:
I only asked the question because I thought it may be of interest to others that have ordered a set or those that just simply have an interest in these sorts of things. I am truly sorry if it offended you, Chuck.
__________________
Wild Skies Since 1951 |
|||||||
01-04-2012, 05:50 PM | #17 | ||||||
|
More Pictures, some people will not believe the quality, but the way I look at it, Connecticut Shotgun make the $49,000 Parker 28 gauge on the same machines, there is no shortcut to Quality in these barrels.
PDD |
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Pat Dugan For Your Post: |
01-04-2012, 05:51 PM | #18 | ||||||
|
I think Chuck has a set on order, but the topic of forend fit makes him a bit touchy, no? Until he sees them. Maybe...
|
||||||
01-04-2012, 06:00 PM | #19 | |||||||
|
Quote:
I got carried away. I had seen this concern stated many times in the past when the barrels were first offered. I even saw where Lou got a little coy about it. Sorry, you're right. |
|||||||
01-04-2012, 06:06 PM | #20 | |||||||
|
Quote:
Heck Joe, that forend was a real find, but it weren't cheap neither. I think I may have the only one in existance. |
|||||||
|
|