View Single Post
Unread 05-29-2018, 10:41 PM   #67
Member
Cold Spring
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,902
Thanks: 3,354
Thanked 6,312 Times in 1,219 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Harlow View Post
………. Because the shot is so much smaller, it is not affected by the drag of the wind and retains so much more energy down range. Being small, it meets less resistance once it enters the game, thus having shot that will penetrate all the way through the animal.
Jerry, much of what's been passed here is in subjective terms (less wind drag, more energy, less resistance, complete penetration through the animal?).

It would be good to see the inventor's tech data that compares velocity and energy bleedoff rates for tungsten vs. lead with the same diameter pellets at 10 yards or so increments, something like 20-30-40-50-60 yards. Also to see the measured penetration at those yardages in an accepted medium like pine wood or similar. Data for lead pellets is available from references. Downrange pattern density is one parameter, but measured terminal velocity, energy and penetration are other important ones for the inventor's different pellet sizes and especially so when recommending something like TSS 9's for turkeys at longish ranges.

"The Tungsten 9s have the same penetration at 70 yards as lead 9s do at 15 yards" ….. I'd particularly like to see the tech data on that.

frank

Last edited by Frank Srebro; 05-30-2018 at 03:57 PM.. Reason: Added some comments
Frank Srebro is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Srebro For Your Post: