Thread: repros
View Single Post
Unread 02-01-2018, 07:58 PM   #20
Member
Kirk Potter
PGCA Member
 
Kirk Potter's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 692
Thanks: 986
Thanked 774 Times in 217 Posts

Default

Personally I don’t consider a Parker reproduction a “Parker”, and that’s nothing against them, I love them for what they are.. But they’re not part of the original continuous production. I’ve had this same discussion about about US WWII firearms. I have a February 1941 M1 Garand and a December 1943 M1 Carbine. Both of these guns are still being produced and the parts interchange, but would you consider them original?
Kirk Potter is offline   Reply With Quote