Bill:
Aside from the reloading option, why would the Polywad Vintager loads not meet Joe’s needs for his 16-gauge hammer gun, while RST loads would? The cost per box of both company’s comparable-appearing product is $11.00.
Both loads are represented to be, in a 2 ˝ inch 16-gauge shell, low recoil and low pressure. (I am not talking about the original Spread-R. load)
In recent years I have used RST more often than Polywad in old and light-weight guns. But, is there a significant difference between the low-pressure, soft-on-the-shoulder offerings of the two companies?
Or, is it that the RST hull is more suited for re-loading?
__________________
"First off I scoured the Internet and this seems to be the place to be!” — Chad Whittenburg, 5-12-19
|