View Single Post
Unread 12-07-2016, 08:22 AM   #6
Member
OH Osthaus
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Rick Losey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 1,720
Thanked 8,380 Times in 3,310 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Oliver View Post
Hello Everyone,

Also the barrel thickness at the breach is the thinnest I have seen in a Damascus gun. The chambers measured 2 5/8” a 2 ½ RST 12 gauge shell seems very loose(side to side until it seated) in the chamber. I put in 2 Original 12A Parker Brass shells, which fit much better. I thought maybe these barrels were honed/polished to the point where there wasn’t too much metal left? I don't know if you can tell from the pictures?

Shooting these thin chambers concerns me a bit, this seems like a black powder gun with light loads. Any thoughts or ideas are appreciated?

a gun of that age was likely chambered for the brass shells

when you say "thin chambers" are you only referring the the wall at the breach? this sounds like a gun to get wall thickness measured on- but if the brass shells fit, that would make sense. It may like BP in brass hulls as a diet.

Over all - great looking early gun
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE
Rick Losey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rick Losey For Your Post: